Rules are rules…and laws are laws! Says in the U.S.
Constitution that all revenue-raising laws and taxes must originate in the
House of Representatives. The Supreme Court declared it a tax, but this was not
a tax bill that originated in the House. Sets the stage for a new (and procedural)
revenue challenge!
By Joe “ The Plumber” Wurzelbacher
Breitbart News
This is important: America needs a hero,
and the Doctor is In.
To prevent the enforcement of the Affordable Care Act in Texas, Dr. Steve
Hotze, a Houston physician announced he is suing the federal government,
claiming the ACA violates federal tax law as written.
The suit claims that ObamaCare radically hikes small-business costs,
impoverishes states and violates the plain language of the U.S. Constitution.
The lawsuit was filed Tuesday in Houston, Texas. The case is Hotze v.
Sebelius, 4:13-cv-1318, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas
(Houston).
Although the Supreme Court ruled the bill to be Constitutional, the
majority opinion offered new hope for the majority of Americans who want it repealed.
Some background:
In June of 2012 The Supreme Court upheld most of the bill commonly known as
“ObamaCare” as being Constitutional, but Justice John Roberts, writing the
majority opinion went out of his way to say that the program was in fact a tax and
not the Supreme Court’s business.
Everyone across the spectrum reacted emotionally to the ruling. Liberals
cheering their unlikely Supreme Court hero, and frustrated conservatives, who
thought ObamaCare was on the way out derided the Justice -- some even labeling
Roberts a “traitor,” and a “coward.”
But the opinion has opened the door to another Constitutional challenge,
which will also highlight the way the bill was rammed through Congress. At the
time, Nancy Pelosi (not that she read it) was not treating it like a tax and
since ObamaCare did not originate in the House. Justice Roberts defining the
bill as a tax meant he was throwing it back into the water for a do-over. In a
nutshell, to correctly challenge the law, it must be challenged as the tax that
it now is.
Was Roberts more concerned with protecting Americans from Big Government
interpretations of the Commerce Clause? Was he giving a wink and a nod to the
States that they need to be protected from that same ever-growing, and
overreaching federal government? In any event, Justice Roberts wrote the
Supreme Court ruling, talked a gaggle of liberal justices into signing onto it,
and made the whole thing look non-partisan in the process.
Roberts refused to legislate from the bench. He threw the matter back to
the legislature that is responsible for empowering legislation. Roberts knew
Obamacare was unconstitutional as a tax, but not as it was brought before the
Court at the time. He cleverly set the stage for a successful appeal.
And it’s here, thanks to Dr. Steve Hotze
“What we were promised was a new health care policy and change that could
be good for all Americans,” Hotze said at the state Capitol, surrounded by
Republican legislators. “Really, all it’s turned out to offer us is higher
premiums, higher taxes and a government that will allow its bureaucrats to
interfere with the doctor-patient relationship.”
His lawsuit offers two constitutional challenges: First, the Affordable
Care Act is in clear violation of the rule requiring tax-bills to originate in
the House. The original bill if you can believe it, was a tax credit bill for
veterans. Secondly, ObamaCare is in violation of the Fifth Amendment by
compelling the purchase of health coverage.
It is forcing individuals and businesses to purchase a consumer product --
in this case, health insurance.
Hotze’s lawsuit claims that by forcing Americans to buy private insurance,
Obamacare violates the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause, which holds that
private property can only be taken for a “public use” and with just
compensation for the property owner.
The suit also claims that the Affordable Care Act is unconstitutional
because revenue-raising laws and taxes must originate in the House of
Representatives. In the 5-4 decision upholding Obamacare, Chief Justice John
Roberts ruled that the law’s penalty on the uninsured is a tax.
"It is imperative that Texas challenge this unwarranted federal
overreach and ensure that Texans maintain the most innovative and economically
viable health care system in the country," he wrote in a statement.
No comments:
Post a Comment