The best way to get around the fact that Death Panels are an essential part of Nationalized Health (read Obamacare) is to simply call it (the Death Panel) something else. In the UK, the NHS call this the “The Liverpool Care Pathway”. Easy….We don’t have Death Panels….we have the more compassionate Liverpool Care Pathway! Just…Sounds as creepy to me!
By Steve Doughty
PUBLISHED:| UPDATED:
Top doctor's chilling claim: The
NHS kills off 130,000 elderly patients every year
- Professor says doctors use 'death
pathway' to euthenasia of the elderly
- Treatment on average brings a
patient to death in 33 hours
- Around 29 per cent of patients
that die in hospital are on controversial 'care pathway'
- Pensioner admitted to hospital
given treatment by doctor on weekend shift
Worrying claim:
Professor Patrick Pullicino said doctors had turned the use of a controversial
'death pathway' into the equivalent of euthanasia of the elderly. NHS doctors
are prematurely ending the lives of thousands of elderly hospital patients
because they are difficult to manage or to free up beds, a senior consultant
claimed yesterday.
Professor Patrick
Pullicino said doctors had turned the use of a controversial ‘death pathway’
into the equivalent of euthanasia of the elderly. He claimed there was often a
lack of clear evidence for initiating the Liverpool Care Pathway, a method of
looking after terminally ill patients that is used in hospitals across the
country. It is designed to come into force when doctors believe it is
impossible for a patient to recover and death is imminent. It can include
withdrawal of treatment – including the provision of water and nourishment by
tube – and on average brings a patient to death in 33 hours.
There are around
450,000 deaths in Britain each year of people who are in hospital or under NHS
care. Around 29 per cent – 130,000 – are of patients who were on the LCP. Professor
Pullicino claimed that far too often elderly patients who could live longer are
placed on the LCP and it had now become an ‘assisted death pathway rather than
a care pathway’. He cited ‘pressure on beds and difficulty with nursing
confused or difficult-to-manage elderly patients’ as factors. Professor Pullicino revealed he had personally
intervened to take a patient off the LCP who went on to be successfully
treated. He said this showed that claims they had hours or days left are
‘palpably false’.
In the example he
revealed a 71-year-old who was admitted to hospital suffering from pneumonia
and epilepsy was put on the LCP by a covering doctor on a weekend shift. Professor
Pullicino said he had returned to work after a weekend to find the patient
unresponsive and his family upset because they had not agreed to place him on
the LCP. ‘I removed the patient from the LCP despite significant resistance,’
he said. ‘His seizures came under control and four weeks later he was
discharged home to his family,’ he said. Professor Pullicino, a consultant
neurologist for East Kent Hospitals and Professor of Clinical Neurosciences at
the University of Kent, was speaking to the Royal Society of Medicine in
London.
Distressing: The
professor has claimed an approved technique of looking after the terminally ill
is not being used in all hospitals. He said: ‘The lack of evidence for
initiating the Liverpool Care Pathway makes it an assisted death pathway rather
than a care pathway. ‘Very likely many elderly patients who could live
substantially longer are being killed by the LCP. ‘Patients are frequently put
on the pathway without a proper analysis of their condition. Predicting death in a time frame of three to
four days, or even at any other specific time, is not possible scientifically”.
This determination
in the LCP leads to a self-fulfilling prophecy. The personal views of the
physician or other medical team members of perceived quality of life or low
likelihood of a good outcome are probably central in putting a patient on the
LCP.’ He added: ‘If we accept the Liverpool Care Pathway we accept that
euthanasia is part of the standard way of dying as it is now associated with 29
per cent of NHS deaths.’ The LCP was developed in the North West during the
1990s and recommended to hospitals by the National Institute for Health and
Clinical Excellence in 2004.
Medical criticisms
of the Liverpool Care Pathway were voiced nearly three years ago.
Experts including
Peter Millard, emeritus professor of geriatrics at the University of London,
and Dr Peter Hargreaves, palliative care consultant at St Luke’s cancer centre
in Guildford, Surrey, warned of ‘backdoor euthanasia’ and the risk that
economic factors were being brought into the treatment of vulnerable patients. In
the example of the 71-year-old, Professor Pullicino revealed he had given the
patient another 14 months of life by demanding the man be removed from the LCP.
Professor Pullicino said the patient was
an Italian who spoke poor English, but was living with a ‘supportive wife and
daughter’. He had a history of cerebral haemorrhage and subsequent seizures.
Professor
Pullicino said: ‘I found him deeply unresponsive on a Monday morning and was
told he had been put on the LCP. He was on morphine via a syringe driver.’ He
added: ‘I removed the patient from the LCP despite significant resistance.’ The patient’s extra 14 months of life came at
considerable cost to the NHS and the taxpayer, Professor Pullicino indicated. He
said he needed extensive support with wheelchair, ramps and nursing.
After 14 months
the patient was admitted to a different hospital with pneumonia and put on the
LCP. The man died five hours later. A Department of Health spokesman said: ‘The
Liverpool Care Pathway is not euthanasia and we do not recognize these figures.
The pathway is recommended by NICE and has overwhelming support from clinicians
– at home and abroad – including the Royal College of Physicians.
‘A patient’s
condition is monitored at least every four hours and, if a patient improves,
they are taken off the Liverpool Care Pathway and given whatever treatments
best suit their new needs.’
No comments:
Post a Comment