By: Carrie Lukas is the managing director of the Independent Women’s Forum
Obamacare isn’t just bad policy;
it’s also a lost opportunity to advance positive health-care reforms. This is a
critical point for the public to understand as the Supreme Court considers
Obamacare’s constitutionality, and as we begin a presidential election in which
the future of the health-care system will be a central issue.
The debate isn’t between Obamacare
and the status quo. No one thinks our current system is optimal. It’s
inefficient and costly, it encourages the over-consumption of care, and it unfairly
disadvantages those who don’t receive insurance through their employer. The
question is which direction we should go. Should we follow Obamacare’s path of
greater government control or find a different way to encourage greater
efficiency, control costs, and improve outcomes?
If Obamacare is struck down or
repealed, policymakers should move quickly to reform our health-care system in
a way that returns the control of resources to individuals and creates a more
competitive health-insurance marketplace. For starters, they should equalize
the tax treatment of individual and employer-sponsored health insurance.
But to really reform our medical
system, policymakers will have to tackle Medicare, because it shapes the
medical system as a whole. Congressman Paul Ryan and Senator Ron Wyden have
laid out a blueprint reforming Medicare that would be a giant leap in the right
direction.
Let’s hope that Obamacare is quickly
laid to rest so we can begin the important national conversation about these
next steps.
The second article you should read follows:— Thomas P. Miller is resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
Repealing
Obamacare is necessary to preserve individual liberty, maintain limited
government, improve health care, and restore economic growth. Prospects for
doing so hinge on a half-dozen key battle fronts, and success thereafter hinges
on several, if not all, of them.
Legal: The Supreme Court could overturn the entire Affordable
Care Act later this year as unconstitutional. That’s possible, but not likely.
But even a partial victory — simply nullifying the individual mandate — would
unravel the political glue that holds this unwieldy and unworkable law
together. Congress would have to fix or replace whatever remained.
Political:
It will take a new president to
sign any law to repeal Obamacare, let alone replace it with better health
policy. This November’s elections also will determine whether Obamacare
opponents regain working control of the Senate.
Legislative:
Fully repealing the entire
health-care law would require 60 votes in the Senate. But a
budget-reconciliation measure could remove its essential features (“debone it”)
with only a narrow majority in both houses of Congress.
Administrative: Obamacare’s complex wiring for implementation could
short-circuit on its own and threaten to crash most of the health-care system.
Many states are refusing to submit to federal command and control. Imaginary
structures and lab experiments (health exchanges, real-time income information,
Washington-created “innovations”) won’t be ready for prime time. By necessity,
we will have to build something else that is effective, cheaper, and
sustainable.
More
appealing alternatives: The time
to fill in a “replace” agenda is long overdue. Good Ideas Exist, but they need
to move from the imaginary to the practical stage and hang together as a whole.
Timing: Repeal-and-replace needs to happen before new subsidy
dollars under Obamacare start flowing to millions of Americans in 2014. Our
future health and prosperity can’t afford further doses of toxic medicine for
another four years.
No comments:
Post a Comment