Tuesday, December 16, 2014

Computers, Family Practice Physicians, Nurse Practitioners, and Physician Assistants...Patients have choices!

Moving past this story below…..Nurses and Physician Assistants will work the Primary Care Management. Physicians will fill the specialty fields. STILL….There will be a physician shortage as America’s population ages and grows!

How computers will replace your doctor

And open the door to a new boom in the nursing industry
By Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry | December 15, 2014
The Week

You've probably read some widespread sillinesses about how technology is moving us toward a world split between "high-skill" and "low-skill" jobs. Worriers claim that people with high-skill jobs will gobble up all of the economic pie, and those with low-skill jobs will be left with mere crumbs. This notion was perhaps best exemplified by economist Tyler Cowen's book Average is Over.
This is nonsense. Because high-skill jobs are in peril, too. And sometimes, their death will make way for a raft of new "low-skill" jobs.
For example, look at the future of the general practitioner of medicine. This is considered the epitome of the high-skilled, secure, remunerative job. Four years of college! Four years of medical school! Internship! Residency! Government-protected cartel membership!
And yet, this profession is going the way of the dodo bird.
To understand why, the first thing you need to understand is that multiple studies have shown that software is better able to diagnose illnesses, with fewer misdiagnoses. Health wonks love this trend, known as evidence-based diagnosis, and medical doctors loathe it, because who cares about saving lives when you can avoid the humiliation of having a computer tell you what to do.
Then you need to look at companies like Theranos, which allow you to get a blood test cheaply and easily at Walgreens, and get more information about your health than you'd get in a typical doctor's visit.
Then look at a company like Sherpaa, whose mobile app provides you diagnoses, helps you get your prescriptions filled, refers you to specialists, and so on. Right now, Sherpaa works with doctors. But there's no reason to think it couldn't eventually work with software (and in the meantime, work with cheaper Indian doctors rather than morbidly expensive American doctors).
But, you say, we won't be able to get rid of the human general practitioner absolutely. People will still need human judgment, and the human touch.
You are right — absolutely right. But the human we need is someone with training closer to a nurse's than a doctor's, and augmented by the right software, would be both cheaper and more effective than a doctor. You might pay a monthly subscription to be able to treat this person as your family "doctor" — although most of your interaction would be with software via an app. They'd be better than a doctor, too — trained in general wellness and prevention, and being able to refer you to specialists if need be.

What room is there left for generalist doctors in that scenario? None. They're the ones who the internet will replace; and it is nurses and other "low-skilled" health workers who will do best out of this shift. And most importantly, it will be great for patients.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

ObamaCare architect says you should die at 75…he even says care should be halted at 75!

There are some politicians that call it a “Death Panel”, but we average Americans call it a “brick wall”! Try getting a bureaucrat or the bureaucracy to redress a wrong by our government….well let’s just say you’re not going to win!!!

Who wants to live forever? Doctor and former Obama health adviser says elderly are 'feeble, ineffectual and pathetic' and he hopes he dies when he's 75

·        Physician Ezekiel Emanuel is a former Obama health policy adviser 
·        Rejects the American 'obsession with an endlessly extended life'
·        Writes in essay: 'For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop'
·        Older brother to Obama's first chief of staff, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel


  |  

A former Obama health policy adviser has insisted he wants to be dead by his 75th birthday as the elderly are 'feeble, ineffectual and pathetic.'

Physicist Ezekiel Emanuel, architect of Obamacare and brother of former Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, claims that longevity often comes at the expense of quality of life and the desire to live longer is 'misguided.'

Writing in the October issue of The Atlantic, he says: 'There is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. 'It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived. 'It robs us of our creativity and ability to contribute to work, society, the world. 'It transforms how people experience us, relate to us, and, most important, remember us.

'We are no longer remembered as vibrant and engaged but as feeble, ineffectual, even pathetic. 
The father-of-three acknowledges that his desire to die in his seventies does not sit well with his family, especially his daughters, but insists he will not change his mind as his years advance.
He says that if parents live to their nineties, their children must give up their retirement time to look after them and the only time they are free is when their parents die - and they are then old themselves.

Emanuel insists in the essay that he is not arguing for euthanasia or assisted suicide at a certain age.
He says that if he was diagnosed with cancer now he would probably have it treated, but when he turns 65 he will have his last colonoscopy and have no screening for prostate cancer at any age.

Emanuel insists that once he turns 75 he will refuse all medical treatment and says he 'die when whatever comes first takes me.'
In the essay, which is published on the website with photos of his family, Emanuel says he will hold a memorial before his death to celebrate his life, but if his survivors want to have one when he has passed away it is not his 'business.'

Emanuel, chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, does acknowledge that sometimes age is not a barrier to creativity.
He cites the case of a prominent health economist who recently celebrated his 90th birthday and continues to be 'brilliant', but insists that the man is simply 'an outlier—a very rare individual.'
Emanuel blasts the American obsession with 'exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins' and says he thinks the mindset is both 'misguided and potentially destructive.'

Emanuel, told ABC's Dr. Richard Besser on This Week: 'I look at the data on disability, I look at the data on Alzheimer's disease, I look at the data on loss of creativity.  

'And 75 seems to be the right moment where the chance of disability, physical disability is low, you're still not in the high Alzheimer's risk of 30 percent or 50 percent and creativity has sort of come to an end.
Emanuel, the director of the Clinical Bioethics Department at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and head of the Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, helped develop President Obama's health care reform law. 
Emanuel's youngest brother is the president's first chief of staff, current Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.

Their other brother is Hollywood agent Ari Emanuel whose clients have included Rhianna, Justin Timberlake, Ben Affleck and Matt Damon. 

The three brothers were raised in Chicago by their father Israeli-born pediatrician Benjamin and mother Marsha, a nurse who was a descendant of Russian immigrants. 

They also have an adopted sister with cerebral palsy who shuns the limelight.

Saturday, October 4, 2014

Obamacare ends Life at age 75...Yep you heard it here first!

Okay…Where do you start with this shit? The guy how wrote the Obamacare law says we “humans” have no right to expect healthcare beyond the age of 75. Nice guy right? Tell your parents or grandparents that it has been nice knowing ‘em ‘cause Obamacare will be happy to have them die! Don’t they make bad movies about this stuff?

Who wants to live forever? Doctor and former Obama health adviser says elderly are 'feeble, ineffectual and pathetic' and he hopes he dies when he's 75

·        Physician Ezekiel Emanuel is a former Obama health policy adviser 
·        Rejects the American 'obsession with an endlessly extended life'
·        Writes in essay: 'For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop'
·        Older brother to Obama's first chief of staff, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel

      By Jill Reilly for MailOnline
·         

  |  

A former Obama health policy adviser has insisted he wants to be dead by his 75th birthday as the elderly are 'feeble, ineffectual and pathetic.'

Physicist Ezekiel Emanuel, architect of Obamacare and brother of former Obama chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, claims that longevity often comes at the expense of quality of life and the desire to live longer is 'misguided.'

Writing in the October issue of The Atlantic, he says: 'There is a simple truth that many of us seem to resist: living too long is also a loss. 

'It renders many of us, if not disabled, then faltering and declining, a state that may not be worse than death but is nonetheless deprived. 

'It robs us of our creativity and ability to contribute to work, society, the world. 
'It transforms how people experience us, relate to us, and, most important, remember us.
'We are no longer remembered as vibrant and engaged but as feeble, ineffectual, even pathetic. 

The father-of-three acknowledges that his desire to die in his seventies does not sit well with his family, especially his daughters, but insists he will not change his mind as his years advance.
He says that if parents live to their nineties, their children must give up their retirement time to look after them and the only time they are free is when their parents die - and they are then old themselves.

Emanuel insists in the essay that he is not arguing for euthanasia or assisted suicide at a certain age. He says that if he was diagnosed with cancer now he would probably have it treated, but when he turns 65 he will have his last colonoscopy and have no screening for prostate cancer at any age.

Emanuel insists that once he turns 75 he will refuse all medical treatment and says he 'die when whatever comes first takes me.'
In the essay, which is published on the website with photos of his family, Emanuel says he will hold a memorial before his death to celebrate his life, but if his survivors want to have one when he has passed away it is not his 'business.'

Emanuel, chair of the Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, does acknowledge that sometimes age is not a barrier to creativity.
He cites the case of a prominent health economist who recently celebrated his 90th birthday and continues to be 'brilliant', but insists that the man is simply 'an outlier—a very rare individual.'

Emanuel blasts the American obsession with 'exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins' and says he thinks the mindset is both 'misguided and potentially destructive.'
Emanuel, told ABC's Dr. Richard Besser on This Week: 'I look at the data on disability, I look at the data on Alzheimer's disease, I look at the data on loss of creativity.  

'And 75 seems to be the right moment where the chance of disability, physical disability is low, you're still not in the high Alzheimer's risk of 30 percent or 50 percent and creativity has sort of come to an end. Emanuel, the director of the Clinical Bioethics Department at the U.S. National Institutes of Health and head of the Department of Medical Ethics & Health Policy at the University of Pennsylvania, helped develop President Obama's health care reform law. 
Emanuel's youngest brother is the president's first chief of staff, current Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel.


Their other brother is Hollywood agent Ari Emanuel whose clients have included Rhianna, Justin Timberlake, Ben Affleck and Matt Damon. The three brothers were raised in Chicago by their father Israeli-born pediatrician Benjamin and mother Marsha, a nurse who was a descendant of Russian immigrants. They also have an adopted sister with cerebral palsy who shuns the limelight.

Friday, September 26, 2014

Obamacare closing more and more private practices....Physicians are leaving small communities

Many, many, many physicians have had to close their private practices, and forced to join hospital owned offices. Either that or find a job not in medicine! Gee…thanks Obamacare….What ever happened to “you can keep your Doctor”? He (Obama) knew that it was a load of crap….and so did all the rest of us. The sooner Obamacare is scrapped the better….just another closed-end, expensive, waste of time and money government program that only Socialist covet!

Alaska Physician Shuts Down Practice, Citing Obamacare
From the Daily Caller
9:39 PM 09/21/2014
Sarah Hurtubise Reporter

After a long list of Obamacare failures in Alaska, one physician is shutting down his decades-old practice, charging that the health-care law and other federal programs are “unsustainable” for practicing doctors.

Dr. William Wennen, a plastic surgeon, is closing his Fairbanks practice after 38 years of working in the state. Dr. Wennen blames federal health insurance programs, citing Obamacare, Medicaid and Medicare, for shutting down his practice.

“It is an unsustainable system,” Dr. Wennen wrote to his customers in a letter obtained by The Daily Caller. “I am personally writing off upwards of three quarters of a million dollars annually in free/uncompensated care.”

“My reasons for closing down the office are simply economic,” Wennen wrote. “The governmental agencies that are supplying ‘medical insurance’ to the elderly, the disadvantaged, the indigent and the sick, injured, or disabled have placed an unrealistically low value of worth on physician’s services.”
Medicaid typically has the lowest physician reimbursements of any federal program. Doctors have been protesting pay cuts for services through Medicaid and Medicare. It’s increasingly difficult for customers to actually find health care providers that accept the coverage — especially in private practice, where doctors are more hard-pressed to be profitable than at big-budget hospitals. 

 “Within the last month, Fairbanks has lost three other much respected physicians for the same or similar reasons,” Dr. Wennen wrote. ”I am not the first and certainly will not be the last of the exodus of physicians from active practice because of all of this.”

Dr. Wennen is far from alone in his stark opposition to the health-care law. A recent survey from the Physicians Foundation found that 46 percent of doctors in the U.S. would give Obamacare a “D” or an “F,” the Washington Examiner reported.


For his part, Wennen hopes to continue providing medical care through other avenues, but can no longer afford to keep his practice. Other doctors nationwide have simply refused to accept coverage provided by federal agencies — even private coverage sold through Obamacare exchanges.

Saturday, September 20, 2014

Physicians argue about the problems and causes of the medical system

Insurance Companies and Medical Malpractice Lawyers will always find a way to take care of politicians (and politicians will take care of them). We the paying consumer seeking medical care…we’re F%*#ed!
Doctors Debate Cause of Their Profession's Woes
By Sean Piccoli
Friday, 19 Sep 2014 21:40 PM
Writing in NewsMax


"It’s just one more of the multiple interferences between the doctor and the patient, and gets in the way of our treatments," Hubbard said of President Barack Obama's signature law. 

"I know that we need some guidance and there are things that need to be changed," said Hubbard, "but all we’re doing now is setting up a more of a bureaucracy, more of people in the middle that are going to frustrate doctors even more and more. And doctors are just going to decide, well, it’s not worth it."

Hubbard said that if he were polled he would give the ACA a "D."

Chris Lillis, an internal medicine specialist and "Doctors for America" contributor, said that the health-care overhaul deserves better. 

"My grade is a B-plus," he said, arguing that "the bureaucracy that remains between me and my patients … is the for-profit health insurance companies."

Lillis said that insurers, even after getting millions of new customers through the state and federal health-insurance exchanges established under the ACA, "are engaging in a lot of underhanded tactics to try to continue to control costs.

"Things like raising the price of generic medicines, restricting networks, forcing prior authorizations on physicians," said Lillis. "And I understand Dr. Hubbard’s concern, but he ought to train his blame on the insurance industry, not on Obamacare."

Wednesday, September 10, 2014

Americans do not for the most-part understand Obamacare, and what they do know....They don't like!

The takeaway here is that Americans for the most part do not understand the law, but what they do understand they (Americans) do not like. Big trouble moving forward for us all. It aint gonna be pretty!


Disapproval of ObamaCare reaches new high, poll finds

By Elise Viebeck - 09/16/13 01:15 PM EDT
A new poll finds 53 percent of people disapprove of ObamaCare and President Obama's approach to healthcare policy, a record high on both questions. 
The survey from USA Today and the Pew Research Center also found Republicans have gained a narrow but telling edge on healthcare issues generally. 
The poll revealed that 40 percent now prefer the GOP on healthcare compared to 39 percent who prefer Democrats, erasing a preference for Democrats that had stretched back more than 20 years.
ADVERTISEMENT
The findings come just two weeks before ObamaCare's new insurance marketplaces open for enrollment. But that process, which is crucial to healthcare reform's success, could see trouble given ongoing confusion among crucial groups. 
About one-third (34 percent) reported that they do not understand how the healthcare law will work, a figure that has only slightly improved since the law's passage.

Meanwhile, nearly four in 10 of the uninsured do not realize they will be required to buy coverage or pay a fine starting next year.

This understanding is better among the general population, where seven in 10 grasp the so-called individual mandate, but worse among young people whose participation in the new exchanges is vital to ObamaCare's success.

Some have attributed the public's weak understanding of healthcare reform to Republicans' opposition to the law.

In Congress, the GOP has voted more than 40 times to repeal, defund or dismantle ObamaCare, and states run by Republicans have often worked against the administration to undermine the law's rollout.

The House GOP is debating how best to thwart ObamaCare during the next fiscal battle to fund the government.
Conservatives want to pass a spending bill that funds every part of the government except the healthcare law, hoping the imminent threat of a shutdown will force Obama to neglect the reform.

But ObamaCare's opponents do not necessarily agree on this tact, according to the poll. A majority (51 percent to 42 percent) said officials should help the law succeed instead of working to ensure its failure.

USA Today and Pew polled 1,506 adults between Sept. 4-8. The survey's margin of error is three percent.


Tuesday, August 26, 2014

It's a start! Computers will replace physicians in the care of the human being! Just a start!

This is only the start. My believe is within a few short years a computer will greet the patient in the waiting room, assist them into the exam room, scan the patient (with the help of an implanted device - yeah...that's coming soon as well), ask a few short questions, then diagnose and prescribe if necessary! You heard it here first. Physicians will be directing, and in some instances assisting the doc-computer.

IBM Watson partners with Modernizing Medicine of Boca Raton
May 17, 2014|By Marcia Heroux Pounds, Sun Sentinel

Modernizing Medicine is partnering with IBM Watson — of Jeopardy! fame — to expand its electronic medical assistant.
With the help of the supercomputer, physicians will soon be able to ask a question of Watson about treatment research and get an immediate response as they're caring for a patient.
The interaction would take place via Modernizing Medicine's iPad tablet customized for specialty physicians such as dermatologists.
"The next decade forward will be the most exciting we've ever seen in computing as we begin to ask the computer questions and get direct answers," said Dan Cane, co-founder and CEO of Modernizing Medicine, based in Boca Raton.
IBM announced Friday that Modernizing Medicine was among three companies chosen for the IBM Watson Ecosystem program designed to develop a new generation of apps.
"The power of Watson is a game-changing proposition. Since we established a Watson developer ecosystem, we've seen the creativity flow from entrepreneurs around the world with business-changing ideas for the Watson technology," said Michael Rhodin, senior vice president for IBM Watson Group.
Watson may be best known for the 2011 stunt when the supercomputer was pitted against the best players on the TV quiz show Jeopardy! The computer won.
Cane said Watson represents a new era in which a computer can understand natural language while Modernizing Medicine collects data to help doctors learn from treatment outcomes.
With Watson, doctors will be able to instantly access research and information about clinical trials in hundreds of medical journals to better assess a treatment for a patient.
"Watson allows us to combine both worlds," Cane said. "It's a phenomenal collaboration."
Modernizing Medicine has built a prototype and plans to make Watson available to dermatologists that use its iPad app later this year, he said.
Cane said the company was working out a financial arrangement with IBM, which he couldn't disclose.
Modernizing Medicine, which was founded in 2010, has more than 3,300 physician practices across the country using its medical assistant systems.
The business has grown to $17.5 million in revenue in three years, employing 175 people.

In 2013, Modernizing Medicine was listed at No. 47 on Forbes' annual ranking of America's Most Promising Companies.

Monday, August 4, 2014

Pull up a chair! Obamacare is causing longer waits to see a Physician!!!


Incentive has been taken away from Physicians to work hard! Just ask Adam Smith in regards to the “Invisible Hand” that causes us to do our best. Remove incentives and fair reimbursements, and what do you get….LONGER WAITING TIMES!

Doctor Wait Times Rise As Obamacare Rolls Out

1/29/2014 @ 11:13AM

h/t FORBES 

Patients are waiting an average of 18 days to schedule an appointment for a doctor, according to a study of appointments for commonly used specialty physicians in 15 major U.S. cities.

The survey by physician staffing and consulting firm Merritt Hawkins comes as a doctor shortage looms as more patients seek medical care under the Affordable Care Act. The health law is bringing millions more Americans health benefits and therefore the ability to pay for a visit to the doctor’s office.

The longest wait to see a doctor was in Boston where the average wait was 45.5 days to schedule an appointment with a family physician, dermatologist, cardiologist, orthopedic surgeon or obstetrician/gynecologist. The survey came from a sampling late last year of nearly 1,400 medical offices across the country.

“In the next two to three years, can we keep a bad situation from getting worse?” asked Travis Singleton, senior vice president at Merritt Hawkins, a subsidiary of AMN Healthcare (AMN). ”Everything will tell you it’s going to get worse and not better.”

The increase in doctor wait times to this point isn’t completely related to the health law. The improving economy is also driving more Americans to the doctor’s office. In recent years, data has showed slow growth in visits to doctor’s office during a period of high unemployment as well as the trend for insurance companies and employers to increase co-payments and deductibles.

“Finding a physician who can see you today, or three weeks from today, can be a challenge, even in urban areas where there is a high ratio of physicians per population,” said Mark Smith, president of Merritt Hawkins.  “The demand for doctors is simply outstripping the supply.” When health care coverage is expanded and there is more access to physicians, wait times rise.

Take Boston, which has a high number of “physicians per capita,” Singleton said. “Yet they still have the longest waits for appointments.”

Massachusetts has had broad health care coverage for most of its residents for several years now and the state’s law was the model for the Affordable Care Act.

“People are accessing the system (in Massachusetts) at greater and greater levels,” Singleton added.

There is, however, good news for appointment times as health care reimbursement moves away from fee-for-service medicine to value-based care that emphasizes the use of accountable care organizations and patient-centered medical homes.

In ACOs and other models, doctors are handing off more responsibilities to physician assistants and nurse practitioners with the physician as more of a quarterback of sorts.

Medicare and most private insurers like those operated by Aetna  (AET), Cigna  (CI), Humana  (HUM),UnitedHealth Group UnitedHealth Group (UNH) and most Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans are linking with ACOs, which push high quality, less expensive care rather than today’s payment system that often leads to excessive care by paying for each treatment or procedure that isn’t always better.

The providers in an ACO are responsible for managing the care of the health plan enrollees and are financially rewarded if the enrollees, or patients, stay out of the more expensive hospital.

“We are much better at managing the health care system and using nonphysicians,” Singleton said. “We are much better at using nurse practitioners and physician assistants.”

 

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

Obamacare forcing more paperwork on physicians....Patient health suffers! Hey...there are only 24 hours in a day!


Anyone that has seen a doctor lately is wondering “why didn’t my doctor look at me….Why was his head buried in that laptop”? The only answer is paperwork is forcing doctors to complete piles of forms to treat my cold & flu. What ever happened to checking my throat, looking down my mouth, and sending me home with antibiotics! This is ruining my healthcare!

 Obamacare Death by Paperwork

By Betsy McCaughey    July, 9th 2014

On July 3, with Americans preparing to celebrate freedom, the Obama administration reduced freedom by adding 1,296 pages of new regulations to ObamaCare. It was a classic pre-holiday document dump, publishing the mind-numbing rules in the Federal Register on the eve of Independence Day, when few were likely to be watching. So much for transparency.

ObamaCare regulations compel doctors and their office staff, business owners, local officials and virtually everyone else subject to the law to spend hours filling out paperwork with no pay for their labor. It’s a colossal theft.

Now four years old, ObamaCare imposes 159 million hours of paperwork a year on the public. That’s the administration’s own estimate, undoubtedly a lowball.

Even so, it’s up by 48 million hours over last year, when fewer regulations had been rolled out. And there’s more to come.

Among the July 3 rules is one that compels doctors who take Medicare to report 18 different clinical measurements on their patients, such as whether they are overweight and have been counseled about weight control.

Doctors who fail to do it will get whacked with lower payments starting in 2015.

The regulators estimate that this single report could take as long as 108 minutes per patient and consume 5.4 million hours a year nationwide. That’s time that could be spent treating patients or calling them to remind them to take their meds.

Instead, the federal bureaucracy is confiscating those hours to serve its own ends.

Small-business owners get hit hard, too. Notably, restaurateurs face 622,000 hours of work to comply with ObamaCare’s menu-labeling rules.

The American Action Forum, a public-policy organization, notes that ObamaCare is in a class by itself, imposing almost three times as much paperwork as the notoriously complex Dodd-Frank financial regulations, and more than 10 times as much as under the Sarbanes-Oxley financial-reform law.

The Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, is the biggest culprit, responsible for 90 million hours a year of ObamaCare paperwork chores. Most are foisted on hospitals, doctors, insurers and local governments.

Because it includes the IRS, Treasury is the No. 2 culprit, with paperwork requirements up 23 percent this year. The IRS is ObamaCare’s chief enforcer; paperwork misery will continue to soar, especially if and when the employer mandate goes into effect.

ObamaCare gives the IRS 46 new functions, including collecting new taxes and exchanging information about you, your family and your income with HHS and state insurance exchanges.

For example, the IRS requires employers to report the value of insurance you get through work in a new box on your W-2, even though it’s not taxable (yet).

And dealing with the IRS is no longer a once-a-year affair. Have a baby, change jobs or get a divorce, and the IRS will be recalculating your insurance compliance and eligibility for premium subsidies.

“It’s unprecedented in recent history, the amount of responsibility the IRS is being given in an area that most people don’t think of as an IRS function,” J. Russell George, a tax official, told Congress last March.

The administration plainly doesn’t want to tell the truth about these burdens.

For example, it claims that people who are uninsured or lose coverage will spend 12.6 minutes a year to comply with the individual mandate. Preposterous: Even when the Web sites work, it takes far longer to shop for insurance and report to the IRS that you’re compliant.

On July 4, 1776, when American patriots signed their Declaration of Independence from Great Britain, they recounted the crimes of the tyrannical British king: “He has erected a multitude of new offices and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”

Nearly 2½ centuries later, our own government is eating out our substance with mandatory paperwork.

Not to mention the drag on our economy.

According to the Heritage Foundation’s 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, America is the only country to have lost economic freedom for seven straight years, now ranking 12th behind Hong Kong,
Singapore, Australia, Canada and seven other nations.

“Burdensome and redundant regulations are the most common barriers to the free conduct of entrepreneurial activity,” Heritage cautions.

But some benefit from this out-of-control regulatory state.

“Government bureaucracies like complexity because it keeps them busy and funded,” warns Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett Packard. She laments that “as a result of these regulations on steroids, innovation, business creation and job growth are being stifled.”

Government bureaucrats are stealing our time, our economic growth and our liberty. Don’t count on Washington to fix the problem.

In the end, only an outraged public can put a stop to this regulatory oppression.

Betsy McCaughey is the author of “Beating ObamaCare 2014.”

 

Monday, July 7, 2014

Obamacare and Federal Law will be closing acute care (small) Hospitals!


Fourth Georgia hospital closes due to Obamacare payment cuts

From Sarah Hurtubise in The Daily Caller

The Federal Government forces hospital to treat (in the Emergency Room) anyone that comes through the door! Obamacare reduces the reimbursement rate, and tries to force states to expand Medicaid at the State’s expense. You tell me what state has a budget that would allow an unfunded Federal mandate? Read below to find out what happens next!


The fourth Georgia hospital in two years is closing its doors due to severe financial difficulties caused by Obamacare’s payment cuts for emergency services.

The Lower Oconee Community Hospital is, for now, a critical access hospital in southeastern Georgia that holds 25 beds. The hospital is suffering from serious cash-flow problems, largely due to the area’s 23 percent uninsured population, and hopes to reopen as “some kind of urgent care center,” CEO Karen O’Neal said.

Many hospitals in the 25 states that rejected the Medicaid expansion are facing similar financial problems. Liberal administration ally Think Progress has already faulted Georgia for not expanding Medicaid as Obamacare envisioned.

But the reality is more complicated. The federal government has historically made payments to hospitals to cover the cost of uninsured patients seeking free medical care in emergency rooms, as federal law mandates that hospitals must care for all patients regardless of their ability to pay.

Because the Affordable Care Act’s authors believed they’d forced all states to implement the Medicaid expansion, Obamacare vastly cut hospital payments, the Associated Press reports.

The Supreme Court ruled that states could reject the Medicaid expansion in 2012, as part of the decision that upheld Obamacare generally. Since that decision, the Obama administration has so far instituted 28 unilateral delays and changes to the health care law’s implementation without congressional approval, Fox Business reports.

From verifying eligibility for subsidies to enforcing employer requirements, the Obama administration has already taken a hacksaw to the health care reform law, but it has made no changes to the provision raising problems for half the nation’s hospitals.

While the feds wait for financial pressure to force states to act, several state governments have been taking things into their own hands. Some have criticized these moves as “hospital bailouts.”

Thursday, June 26, 2014

Hospitals are collecting consumer purchases…beware drinkers, over eaters, and the lazy…you have been warned!


 
 
You are on notice...BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING...and you will pay! But ah....if you are over using the system because of self destructive behavior (i.e. drug, drink, too much food...)  you should have to pay more! Just saying!
 
Hospitals Spy on Your Purchases to Spot Bad Habits

By Shannon Pettypiece and Jordan Robertson Jun 26, 2014 12:01 AM ET

You may soon get a call from your doctor if you’ve let your gym membership lapse, made a habit of picking up candy bars at the check-out counter or begin shopping at plus-sized stores.
That’s because some hospitals are starting to use detailed consumer data to create profiles on current and potential patients to identify those most likely to get sick, so the hospitals can intervene before they do.
Information compiled by data brokers from public records and credit card transactions can reveal where a person shops, the food they buy, and whether they smoke. The largest hospital chain in the Carolinas is plugging data for 2 million people into algorithms designed to identify high-risk patients, while Pennsylvania’s biggest system uses household and demographic data. Patients and their advocates, meanwhile, say they’re concerned that big data’s expansion into medical care will hurt the doctor-patient relationship and threaten privacy.
“It is one thing to have a number I can call if I have a problem or question, it is another thing to get unsolicited phone calls. I don’t like that,” said Jorjanne Murry, an accountant in Charlotte, North Carolina, who has Type 1 diabetes. “I think it is intrusive.”
Acxiom Corp. (ACXM) and LexisNexis are two of the largest data brokers who collect such information on individuals. They say their data are supposed to be used only for marketing, not for medical purposes or to be included in medical records.
While both sell to health insurers, they said it’s to help those companies offer better services to members.
Bigger Picture
Much of the information on consumer spending may seem irrelevant for a hospital or doctor, but it can provide a bigger picture beyond the brief glimpse that doctors get during an office visit or through lab results, said Michael Dulin, director of research and evidence-based medicine at Carolinas HealthCare System.
Carolinas HealthCare System operates the largest group of medical centers in North Carolina and South Carolina, with more than 900 care centers, including hospitals, nursing homes, doctors’ offices and surgical centers. The health system is placing its data, which include purchases a patient has made using a credit card or store loyalty card, into predictive models that give a risk score to patients.
Within the next two years, Dulin plans for that score to be regularly passed to doctors and nurses who can reach out to high-risk patients to suggest interventions before patients fall ill.
Buying Cigarettes
For a patient with asthma, the hospital would be able to score how likely they are to arrive at the emergency room by looking at whether they’ve refilled their asthma medication at the pharmacy, been buying cigarettes at the grocery store and live in an area with a high pollen count, Dulin said.
The system may also score the probability of someone having a heart attack by considering factors such as the type of foods they buy and if they have a gym membership, he said.
“What we are looking to find are people before they end up in trouble,” said Dulin, who is also a practicing physician. “The idea is to use big data and predictive models to think about population health and drill down to the individual levels to find someone running into trouble that we can reach out to and try to help out.”
While the hospital can share a patient’s risk assessment with their doctor, they aren’t allowed to disclose details of the data, such as specific transactions by an individual, under the hospital’s contract with its data provider. Dulin declined to name the data provider.
Greater Detail
If the early steps are successful, though, Dulin said he would like to renegotiate to get the data provider to share more specific details on patient spending with doctors.
“The data is already used to market to people to get them to do things that might not always be in the best interest of the consumer, we are looking to apply this for something good,” Dulin said.
While all information would be bound by doctor-patient confidentiality, he said he’s aware some people may be uncomfortable with data going to doctors and hospitals. For these people, the system is considering an opt-out mechanism that will keep their data private, Dulin said.
‘Feels Creepy’
“You have to have a relationship, it just can’t be a phone call from someone saying ‘do this’ or it just feels creepy,” he said. “The data itself doesn’t tell you the story of the person, you have to use it to find a way to connect with that person.”
Murry, the diabetes patient from Charlotte, said she already gets calls from her health insurer to try to discuss her daily habits. She usually ignores them, she said. She doesn’t see what her doctors can learn from her spending practices that they can’t find out from her quarterly visits.
“Most of these things you can find out just by looking at the patient and seeing if they are overweight or asking them if they exercise and discussing that with them,” Murry said. “I think it is a waste of time.”
While the patients may gain from the strategy, hospitals also have a growing financial stake in knowing more about the people they care for.
Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare, hospital pay is becoming increasingly linked to quality metrics rather than the traditional fee-for-service model where hospitals were paid based on their numbers of tests or procedures.
Hospital Fines
As a result, the U.S. has begun levying fines against hospitals that have too many patients readmitted within a month, and rewarding hospitals that do well on a benchmark of clinical outcomes and patient surveys.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, which operates more than 20 hospitals in Pennsylvania and a health insurance plan, is using demographic and household information to try to improve patients’ health. It says it doesn’t have spending details or information from credit card transactions on individuals.
The UPMC Insurance Services Division, the health system’s insurance provider, has acquired demographic and household data, such as whether someone owns a car and how many people live in their home, on more than 2 million of its members to make predictions about which individuals are most likely to use the emergency room or an urgent care center, said Pamela Peele, the system’s chief analytics officer.
Emergency Rooms
Studies show that people with no children in the home who make less than $50,000 a year are more likely to use the emergency room, rather than a private doctor, Peele said.
UPMC wants to make sure those patients have access to a primary care physician or nurse practitioner they can contact before heading to the ER, Peele said. UPMC may also be interested in patients who don’t own a car, which could indicate they’ll have trouble getting routine, preventable care, she said.
Being able to predict which patients are likely to get sick or end up at the emergency room has become particularly valuable for hospitals that also insure their patients, a new phenomenon that’s growing in popularity. UPMC, which offers this option, would be able to save money by keeping patients out of the emergency room.
Obamacare prevents insurers from denying coverage because of pre-existing conditions or charging patients more based on their health status, meaning the data can’t be used to raise rates or drop policies.
New Model
“The traditional rating and underwriting has gone away with health-care reform,” said Robert Booz, an analyst at the technology research and consulting firm Gartner Inc. (IT) “What they are trying to do is proactive care management where we know you are a patient at risk for diabetes so even before the symptoms show up we are going to try to intervene.”
Hospitals and insurers need to be mindful about crossing the “creepiness line” on how much to pry into their patients’ lives with big data, he said. It could also interfere with the doctor-patient relationship.
The strategy “is very paternalistic toward individuals, inclined to see human beings as simply the sum of data points about them,” Irina Raicu, director of the Internet ethics program at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, said in a telephone interview.